How do alliances lead to war

However, the assassination was not the sole motive for the beginning of World War I and there were, in fact, a myriad of underlying issues that exacerbated the situation.

Alliances made between countries served to complicate things and made many countries feel obligated to participate. Most people would say the causes were imperialism, nationalism, alliances and militarism. According to alphahistory. Toward the end of the s, several imperial powers existed. The British empire was the largest. Both France and Britain had many colonies in Africa and Asia. Germany, Italy and others, including the United States wanted to expand their empires …show more content… Alliances are formed for different reasons such as the need for financial or military support, trade agreements, investments or loans.

Alliances became strong in the early s when european nations either wanted to support French dictator Napoleon Bonaparte or they wanted to defeat him. Alliances weakened in the mid s, but strengthened again in the late s. Most alliances were signed in private and not all details were told to the public. The secretive nature caused other countries to be suspicious. As the large nations banded together in many different alliances for different reasons, they built relationships and gained resources needed to go to war.

Alliances were a major reason the war became bigger. Because of alliances, Russia came to aid Serbia and that led Germany to declare war on Russia. Eventually the other countries with alliances joined …show more content… The growth in the armies and navies of all the large empires gave them the resources to go to war.

Britain had a large and powerful navy. Germany wanted to have the same thing too, or even bigger and better. All the countries felt like they had to build up their militaries to keep up with everyone else. Not just one of the four causes takes the blame for starting WWI. All of these things: imperialism, nationalism, alliances, and militarism combined to make a large war, involving many countries, which took several years to.

An example was France and England, who were ancient rivals, which led to open warfare several times. Another example was the relationship between France and Germany. As France and Russia were sworn enemies, this alliance gave some of the European states some protection.

Alliances prevented larger, stronger states from waging war on the smaller, weaker states. In the s, alliances were both a defence measure and a political instrument. It was not uncommon for kings and princes to form, reform, or restructure alliances in an attempt to benefit their interests. Sometimes this was just a move to isolate and starve their rivals. These alliances often did not last as they either collapsed when new leaders took over or were replaced by other alliances.

European nations either allied themselves in support of Bonaparte or rallied to defeat him. Between European leaders, seven anti-Napoleonic coalitions were formed between and After Napoleon was defeated in at Waterloo, England, European leaders strived to restore normality and achieve stability in their respective nations.

It proved successful over a short period, then began weakening in the mids. The presence of emperors and their interests, changes in administration, a series of revolutions, and rising nationalist movements where the state wanted to own everything in Germany, Italy, and other countries saw European tensions rise again and marked the beginning of rivalries. Alliances were favoured once again as nations tried to defend and advance their interests.

After the unification of Germany, Chancellor Otto von Bismarck secured a strong alliance with the great powers of Austria-Hungary and Russia. This alliance formed a basis for the Triple Alliance. In , a military alliance formed between Germany and Austria-Hungary, stating that should Russia attack either country, they would unite forces and defend the other. German nationalists believed in this treaty as they saw it as a way of achieving their goal of uniting Germany and Austria as one nation.

Formed in , Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy made a complex three-way alliance. All of the signatories were willing to provide military support to each other if they were attacked by either of the two powers. Italy was viewed as the weak link in this alliance, being newly formed and having a small army. The way Germany planned to do that was to first help Austria-Hungary seize territory in the Balkans. As a multinational state, it faced difficulties in consolidating the nations in its territory.

At its heyday, in the first years after the Congress of Vienna, the new consensus among the Great Powers was strong enough to make separate alliance treaties between some of them seem irrelevant. In the s, with disputes over the future of Spain and her former colonies in Latin America and divergent intentions in the Eastern Question, Great Power relations were transformed.

New alliances were forged between Britain and France and between the conservative monarchies of Russia, Prussia, and Austria. The latter was perceived as a bulwark anti-revolutionary policy, the former as a cooperation of more liberal-minded cabinets.

With regard to the decline of the Ottoman Empire and its geopolitical consequences, different patterns of alignment emerged in His nephew, Napoleon III, Emperor of the French , was instrumental in the formation of an anti-Russian war coalition in The Crimean War was a decisive blow to the Vienna Settlement, although the peace treaty of Paris in reiterated the idea of a Concert of Europe.

It left Russia reeling from defeat and encouraged further revision of the international system. Alliances became important tools in the ensuing transformation of Europe.

The so-called Wars of Italian Independence and of German Unification changed the map of Europe by creating new nation states. They also left the Habsburg Monarchy and France in a much weaker position. The creation of Germany under Prussian leadership and the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine was the most obvious shift in the balance of power.

In a series of three victorious wars, Prussia had forged the economically and militarily strong German Empire, which now held a particularly powerful position on the continent. Ever the skillful diplomat, Bismarck was able to achieve this much, but he left a difficult legacy to his successors after his dismissal in It turned out to be particularly difficult to maintain close ties with Russia without encouraging St. Petersburg to wage a policy of expansion on the Balkans.

Several times, Bismarck tried to build on the traditional pattern of anti-revolutionary cooperation between the monarchies of the Romanovs, the Hohenzollern, and the Habsburgs. It evoked the spirit of the Holy Alliance, but would not survive the clash of interests between Austria-Hungary and Russia that developed just a few years later over the expansion of Russian influence in South East Europe and the creation of a Greater Bulgaria in the San Stefano peace treaty between Russia and the Ottoman Empire.

The Balkan Crisis of the s and the Congress of Berlin in , at which Bismarck did not save Russia from international pressure to give up on the project of Greater Bulgaria, rattled the foundations of the cooperation between the three conservative monarchies of the Hohenzollerns, the Romanovs, and the Habsburgs.

The secret alliance treaty of 7 October assured Austria-Hungary of German military assistance in case of a Russian attack on the Dual Monarchy. Austria-Hungary also committed herself to come to the rescue of her ally in case of a Russian attack on Germany, a highly unlikely scenario. Benevolent neutrality was all they had to promise, unless France would be fighting alongside Russia. In this way, Bismarck avoided a situation in which the weaker of the allies would be able to steer the stronger one towards war.

The German chancellor was not only trying to commit Vienna to close coordination of its Balkan policy with Berlin; he also hoped to make the Dual Alliance the cornerstone of cooperation in other fields and to tie the Habsburg Monarchy to the German Reich in a way reminiscent of the Holy Roman Empire.

Nevertheless, the Dual Alliance was not considered to be just another international treaty, but rather the foundation and symbol of a special relationship between the German Empire and the Dual Monarchy.

The very basis of Austro-Hungarian dualism, the dominating influence of the Germans in Austria and the Magyars in Hungary, was seen as non-negotiable in Berlin, in order to keep Slav aspirations in Europe at bay.

With Italy staying out of the fray in , the Dual Alliance became the nucleus of what would be called the war coalition of the Central Powers. As in the case of Germany, the creation of Italy as a nation state had come at the expense of the Habsburg Monarchy. But unlike Germany, where the idea of uniting the German-speaking parts of Austria with the German Empire enjoyed almost no support, the vision of an Italy that included the Italian-speaking regions of the Habsburg Monarchy held considerable appeal for the Italian elites.

In addition, the aspiring new — and still not very strong — Great Power Italy was vying with Austria-Hungary for control in the Adriatic. The potential for conflict between both powers notwithstanding, Italy had reasons to cover her back while she was striving for colonial expansion in the Mediterranean.

If two or more of the Great Powers attacked one of the three alliance partners, the other two would also be required to intervene by force.

If only one Great Power forced one of the allies to resort to war, the others were obliged to keep a neutral stance, unless they decided to help militarily. Its text would be kept secret, as would the articles that were to be added in later years when the treaty was up for renewal. This was formalized in a set of agreements brokered by Bismarck that culminated in a treaty between Great Britain and Italy in February , with Austria-Hungary in March and with Spain in May The so-called Mediterranean Entente defused conflicts between Austria-Hungary and Italy, but most importantly, it contained Russia in the Eastern Mediterranean quite successfully in the late s and early s.

In , when the Triple Alliance was to be renewed for the second time, the Austrian minister of foreign affairs suggested to the Italians that an agreement between the two allies should be included, which aimed to preserve the status quo in the Balkans and the territorial integrity of the Ottoman Empire.

In the years before, the article kept a lid on Austro-Italian rivalry in Albania. During the Italo-Turkish War of , Rome could count on the tacit support or at least acquiescence of the other Great Powers. As the Ottoman Empire, weakened by the Italian attack on its North African possessions and the ensuing war, came close to collapse in in its fight against the Balkan League, which had been forged by Russian diplomacy, the Great Powers set up the London conference. The Concert of Europe was meant to contain the shockwaves and to help find viable solutions to territorial disputes when the spoils of war were divided up.

The Triple Alliance was renewed for the last time in December , in the wake of the First Balkan War, with tensions between the Great Powers at crisis level. In Austria-Hungary, suspicions of Italian duplicity were widespread. Rivalry between both allies in the Adriatic and fear of Italian plans to grab Habsburg territory fueled anxieties and inspired military build-up and heavy-handed policing along the border.

A naval armaments race between the allies ensued in the early s that would slow down only on the eve of war. Whereas the alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary had been pivotal to Italian efforts to become a modern, respected great power in the s and most of the s, in the early 20 th century, ties to Vienna and Berlin had become a matter of weighing strategic opportunities.

Italy was not the only one about to jump ship and seek closer relations with Britain, France, and Russia; Romania was, as well. In both cases, Austria-Hungary stood in the way of the possibility of expanding influence and gaining territories in the Balkans. Both in Italy and in Romania, the hope of annexing parts of the Habsburg Monarchy that had a majority population of co-nationals started to gain more traction among publicists and politicians. Fears of such a policy among the political elites in Vienna and Budapest were not without justification, but greatly exaggerated.

Nevertheless, those fears fed into a growing sense of instability and imminent threat to the very existence of the Habsburg Monarchy. By , the future of the Triple Alliance seemed to be in question, but many decision-makers in Vienna and in Berlin who started the July Crisis hoped to keep the Triple Alliance — including Romania — together in case of a European war, or at least to be able to count on Italian and Romanian neutrality.

Until the late s, the French Republic held a rather isolated position among the Great Powers. Colonial disputes with Britain and Italy played a role, but so did the perception of France as a standard-bearer of revolution. Republicanism and revolution were considered deadly threats to Europe in general and to Russia in particular, especially by the tsar and his government.

French politicians sensed an opening for closer relations with the only strategic partner left on the continent that might help to counter Germany.

The detention of Russian anarchists in France made the republic more palatable to the tsar. Financial support was something the French Republic had to offer, but it also had sizable military capabilities. The visit of a French naval squadron to the Russian harbor of Kronstadt and a Russian return visit to Toulon in made the realignment public. It was the French who insisted on a written agreement. In August , the two general staffs signed a military convention that would be endorsed by an exchange of diplomatic notes.

Thus, on 4 January , the agreement between the general staffs gained the status of an alliance treaty. Just as in the case of the Dual Alliance, the Franco-Russian alliance was a defensive one. Russia promised support with all her forces available in case of an attack on France by Germany or by Italy with German assistance.

Unlike the Dual Alliance or the Triple Alliance treaties, the Franco-Russian agreement was more specific in terms of military aspects. Article 2 regulated mobilization and deployment:. In Article 3, the text even mentioned troop numbers and defined the basic strategic concept of coalition warfare :. Little wonder that Article 4 called for close cooperation between the two general staffs in order to allow for coordinated campaigns in case of war.